BVR CONSULTING INC
  • HOME
  • OUR SERVICES
    • BUSINESS REGISTRATION
    • BACK OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES
    • I.T. SOLUTIONS
    • BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING
    • PAYROLL SERVICES
    • TAX COMPLIANCE & ACCOUNTING
    • INTERNAL AUDIT
  • BVR ACCOUNTING
    • TAX COMPLIANCE & ACCOUNTING
    • INTERNAL AUDIT
  • CONTACT US
  • ARTICLES
    • TESTIMONIALS
    • BLOG

a collections of case digests and laws that can help aspiring law students to become a lawyer. 
this webpage is
 primarily designed to assist students of law in their studies. It is merely a tool. The use of our Services does not guarantee success in obtaining a law degree nor in passing the Bar Exams. we makes no warranties or representations of any kind, whether expressed or implied for the Services provided. The cases, laws, and other publications found in this site are of public domain, collected from public sources such as the Supreme Court online library. The content however have been heavily modified, formatted, and optimized for better user experience, and are no longer perfect copies of their original. we gives no warranty for the accuracy or the completeness of the materials. This site also contains materials published by the students, professors, lawyers, and other users of the our Services. 


People v. Judge Dacuycuy, 173 SCRA 90

6/20/2020

0 Comments

 
ISSUE:  Whether or not the case constitutes an undue delegation of legislative power, the duration of the penalty of imprisonment being solely left to the discretion of the court as if the latter were the legislative department of the Government 

FACTS: 
Private respondents were charged with violating RA 4670 (Magna Carta for Public School Teachers), for which they have been convicted of. The penal provision, Section 32 of said Act, states that "x x x upon conviction, [they] may be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred pesos, or by imprisonment, in the discretion of the court." Respondents posited that said penalty merely indicated as imprisonment is too broad and should not be enforced. 

DECISION: 
Decision and resolution of respondent judge are REVERSED and SET ASIDE 

RATIO DECIDENDI: 
There is undue delegation of legislative powers. Section 32 of RA 4670 provides an indeterminable period of imprisonment, with no maximum or minimum period set by legislative authority. The courts are thus given a wide latitude of discretion, without benefit of sufficient standard. This cannot be allowed, as it vests in the courts a power and a duty essentially legislative in nature and is thus violative of the rules on separation of powers as well as non-delegability of legislative powers.  
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    March 2018

    Categories

    All
    Agrarian Law
    Articles-of-incorporation
    By-laws
    Constitutional Law
    Criminal Law
    Law
    Persons And Family Relations

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • HOME
  • OUR SERVICES
    • BUSINESS REGISTRATION
    • BACK OFFICE SUPPORT SERVICES
    • I.T. SOLUTIONS
    • BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING
    • PAYROLL SERVICES
    • TAX COMPLIANCE & ACCOUNTING
    • INTERNAL AUDIT
  • BVR ACCOUNTING
    • TAX COMPLIANCE & ACCOUNTING
    • INTERNAL AUDIT
  • CONTACT US
  • ARTICLES
    • TESTIMONIALS
    • BLOG