a collections of case digests and laws that can help aspiring law students to become a lawyer
Casupanan v. Laroya
388 SCRA 28
Two vehicles, one driven by respondent Laroya and the other owned by petitioner Capitulo and driven by petitioner Casupanan, figured in an accident. As a result, two cases were filed with the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Capas, Tarlac. Laroya filed a criminal case against Casupanan for reckless imprudence resulting in damage to property, while Casupanan and Capitulo filed a civil case against Laroya for quasi-delict.
Whether or not an accused in a pending criminal case for reckless imprudence can validly file, simultaneously and independently, a separate civil action for quasi-delict against the private complainant in the criminal case.
Yes. The accused can file a civil action for quasi-delict for the same act or omission he is accused of in the criminal case. This is expressly allowed in paragraph 6, Section 1 of the present Rule 111 which states that any cause of action which could have been the subject of the offense may be litigated in a separate civil action. In this case, the counterclaim of the accused shall be litigated in a separate civil action