a collections of case digests and laws that can help aspiring law students to become a lawyer.
|
Ang Tek Lian v. Court of Appeals
[G.R. No. L-2516. September 25, 1950] Facts: Petitioner drew a check payable to the order of “cash” knowing that he had no funds. He delivered it in exchange of money. Petitioner was found guilty of estafa, but petitioner argued that the check had not been indorsed by him, hence, he should not be held guilty thereof. Issue: Whether or not indorsement is necessary to negotiate a check payable to the order of “cash”. Held: NO. Indorsement is no longer necessary. Under the Negotiable Instruments Law (Sec. 9 [d]), a check drawn payable to the order of “cash” is a check payable to bearer, and the bank may pay it to the person presenting it for payment without the drawer’s indorsement. Being a bearer instrument, negotiation may be done by mere delivery of the instrument. Where a check is made payable to the order of "cash", the word cash "does not purport to be the name of any person", and hence the instrument is payable to bearer. The drawee bank need not obtain any indorsement of the check, but may pay it to the person presenting it without any indorsement. .
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
May 2024
Categories
All
|